- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:52:11 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18912 --- Comment #9 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #4) > > FWIW I think there are four plausible candidates here: > > > > 1. the shadow root > > 2. null (the projection is a "hole") > > 3. the content or shadow element that projected the element > > 4. the parent of #3 (which may be the shadow root in some cases) > > I am wondering why we cannot return the projected children? > Does it relate to the lower-bound Encapsulation rule? Since our event dispatch does not retarget at the lower boundary. For consistency, given an element at x, y (let's call it HIT), I think we should: 1) return HIT if it's a descendant of an element, distributed in an insertion point 2) return <shadow> if HIT is in a nested tree. WDYT? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 21:52:12 UTC