- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 21:22:13 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16904
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|17050 |15480
--- Comment #1 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-05-14 21:22:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Exposing getElementById() etc. here but not on DocumentFragment does not make
> sense to me. Is NodeSelector not enough?
NodeSelector is quite sufficient. Are you thinking we should just remove get*
methods from ShadowRoot?
> Selection is exposed as window.getSelection() today. Why should it be
> ShadowRoot.selection?
Yup, my bad. Fixed this in
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rev/d694bf9b9d3c.
> Should we actually define this interface in the DOM? Introducing new nodes
> outside the DOM specification seems kind of odd.
I agree, I think we need to align this spec with the DOM Core and HTML specs,
as we discussed at the F2F.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 21:22:15 UTC