- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 21:10:10 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16176 --- Comment #20 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-05-14 21:10:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Thank you for updating the spec, Dimitri! Thank you for reviewing it! :) > > About 6.2 Retargeting relatedTarget; > > > 2. Let ANCESTOR be ADJUSTED > > That should be '2. Let ANCESTOR be RELATED'. Fixed. > > > 1. If there is a DOM node that is a member of CANDIDATES and is in the same subtree as TARGET, let ADJUSTED be this DOM node > > There may be multiple candidates in the same subree. In such case, we should > pick up "the lowest'"candidate from the candidates. Ah. good point. I think I need to change the CANDIDATES collection algorithm to only pick up unique items. > > > 2. Otherwise, let TARGET be the result of running the parent calculation algorithm with TARGET as input > > That should not be 'the parent calculation algorithm'. The next TARGET should > be either 'TARGET.parentNode() or TARGET.host(). If we use 'parent calculation > algorithm' here, ADJUSTED might be a node which is not accessible from the > NODE. Ooh, you're right! Thanks, fixed. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rev/6486c4deeb63 -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 21:10:13 UTC