- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 05:18:25 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17023 --- Comment #12 from Shinya Kawanaka <shinyak@chromium.org> 2012-05-11 05:18:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > It seems you guys gave me comment when I was writing the followings: :) > > My suggestions are: > > - For active InsertionPoints, attached ShadowRoots should not be used. > - For inactive InsertionPoint, attached ShadowRoots should take effect. > - It is okay to attach a ShadowRoot to either active or inactive > InsertionPoints. > - It is okay to move a InsertionPoint inside the ShadowRoot or outside the > ShadowRoot. That might change its active/inactive status, but that should not > get rid of its attached ShadowRoots. > The first bullet: > For active InsertionPoints, attached ShadowRoots should not be used. means: the ShadowRoot will not be rendered, and the distribution algorithm for InsertionPoints will run, right? If so, I think these suggestions make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 05:18:28 UTC