[Bug 17023] [Shadow]: Can an InsertionPoint be a shadow host?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17023

--- Comment #12 from Shinya Kawanaka <shinyak@chromium.org> 2012-05-11 05:18:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It seems you guys gave me comment when I was writing the followings: :)
> 
> My suggestions are:
> 
> - For active InsertionPoints, attached ShadowRoots should not be used.
> - For inactive InsertionPoint, attached ShadowRoots should take effect.
> - It is okay to attach a ShadowRoot to either active or inactive
> InsertionPoints.
> - It is okay to move a InsertionPoint inside the ShadowRoot or outside the
> ShadowRoot. That might change its active/inactive status, but that should not
> get rid of its attached ShadowRoots.
> 

The first bullet:
> For active InsertionPoints, attached ShadowRoots should not be used.
means:
  the ShadowRoot will not be rendered, 
  and the distribution algorithm for InsertionPoints will run,
right?

If so, I think these suggestions make sense.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 05:18:28 UTC