- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:52:49 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16496
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2012-03-24 00:52:48 UTC ---
Yes that is confusingly worded. What I mean to say is that if there is an
exception interface object (because sometimes there isn't, due to
[NoInterfaceObject]) then it will have a property for each constant as long as
the property name is not "prototype".
I forgot though that I've already forbidden any IDL definitions from having the
name "prototype", so I can drop that conditional.
I've reworded it by talking about the exception interface prototype object
first.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 00:52:53 UTC