[Bug 16425] MutationObserver::observe/disconnect should return mutationobserver itself

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16425

Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |jonas@sicking.cc
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #3 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2012-03-19 19:33:43 UTC ---
Anne: "we haven't used this pattern anywhere else" is a terrible reason. Up
until recently we also had never used dictionaries.

I hope that there's a better reason that than, such as that it fosters bad
development practices, that it's bad for performance, or that it can result in
buggy code?

Reopening since so far no good reason has been made.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 19 March 2012 19:33:47 UTC