[Bug 15954] [Shadow]: The dilemma of document DOM tree mutations

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15954

--- Comment #7 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2012-03-01 00:09:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Yes, if you add something to the light DOM, it should be prefixed so that you
> > have a reasonable expectation of avoiding collisions.
> > 
> > The idea of applying an "overlay" from the shadow to the light dom is
> > interesting.
> 
> don't SVGInstances have something like that?

They don't do anything overlay-like.  SVGElementInstance objects are just a
tree of objects reflecting the structure of a shadow tree inside a <use>
element, and letting you find which light DOM nodes the shadow nodes correspond
to.  (The actual shadow DOM nodes are always inaccessible in SVG currently.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 00:09:52 UTC