- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:54:35 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17090 --- Comment #3 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> 2012-06-13 00:54:35 UTC --- Okay. I am for it. Event dispatching returns to us. :) I think that it must be useful for developers to know most *accurate* node as event.target as long as it does not break encapsulation. Let me formulate which node event.target should be. (In reply to comment #2) > I think we should break the encapsulation boundary symmetry here. > > Since the insertion point is specifically designed to be replaced by contents > of a shadow host when rendering, we can justify saying that the insertion > points do not retarget. > > Of course, this means we have to rethink the whole thing again :) Yikes! -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 00:54:38 UTC