- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:45:27 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18382 --- Comment #4 from Takashi Sakamoto <tasak@google.com> 2012-07-26 02:45:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > With each additional flag I think there is a danger that the spec becomes too > hard to understand. > > Applying @host rules could depend on whether the shadow root is included with > <shadow>, along with all of the other rules in the stylesheets in the shadow > root. I don’t think it is worth letting people special-case @host with a flag. Does this mean that just @host @-rule doesn't depend on whether <shadow> is active or not? I mean the case: "when an insertion point or a shadow insertion poing has nothing assigned or distributed to them, the fallback content must be used instead when rendering." written in shadow dom spec 5.5 Hosting Multiple Shadow Subtrees. Best regards, Takashi Sakamoto -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 02:45:28 UTC