- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:52:04 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17085 --- Comment #4 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-07-20 17:52:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > "All other HTML elements in the shadow DOM subtrees must behave as if they were > > part of the document tree, though scoped to their subtrees." > > Maybe it is Monday morning speaking, but as an implementer, I don’t know if > that means the above example should set document.cookie (ie behave as if it > were part of the document tree) or not (ie be scoped to its subtree)? Because > subtrees don’t have cookies, I guess it is the former, so what does the "scoped > to their subtrees" phrase control? I made it more clear what the "scoped" means by explicitly referencing the "scoping constraints" (and linking to them). http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/rev/cade79aaed01 What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 17:52:06 UTC