- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:41:14 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14694
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |15658
--- Comment #4 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-02-28 21:41:13 UTC ---
For those interested, I am working on this as part of the HTML templates spec.
See a slightly out-of-date spec here:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html#parsing
It's out of date because I then went to play with WebKit's HTML parser to make
it do this, purely to learn more about parsing:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78734, which revealed a few more places
that still need spec work.
Since that templates are defined as a vehicle to build document fragments
declaratively, the DWIM insertion mode (called "template contents" mode in HTML
Templates draft) effectively describes the behavior of
DocumentFragment.prototype.set.
However for templates, there's also another degree of freedom of the context in
which a <template> tag can appear.
I am ok with keeping both together or separate. Whatever makes things move
faster. I have both time, energy, and now a bit of expertise to write the
modifications. Just need a consensus on the path :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 21:41:17 UTC