- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:34:34 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18732 --- Comment #19 from Scott Miles <sjmiles@chromium.org> 2012-08-29 21:34:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > I meant to echo my original example where the user has done this: > > > > x = document.querySelector("x-awesome"); > > x.addEventListener("onclick", awesomeClick); > > > Well, in that case the default listener would be fine. > And btw, it is click, not onclick ;) > > There is the upgrade event, which dev could use to add necessary listeners. > In fact, I'd say listener shouldn't added to the element before it is the > right kind of element (document.register is called). I understand, but again I'm concerned about average developer. He starts with <x-awesome onclick="awesomeClick()"></x-awesome> Then somebody tells him it's a security issue, so he changes it to do x = document.querySelector("x-awesome"); x.addEventListener("click", awesomeClick); Then his page doesn't work, and now he has to go look up about custom elements and do things differently because 'custom elements are weird'. In general, I want consumers of custom-elements to need to require as little arcana as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 21:34:35 UTC