- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:17:35 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18630 --- Comment #4 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-08-20 23:17:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't have a strong technical reason, but it looks natural for me at first > glance. Here's why I think we should stay with option A (which is what is in HTML spec right now): 1) No additional work necessary. The HTML spec clearly states that the event is dispatched on HTMLImageElement. 2) Logically, there's a clear separation of responsibilities. The <real-image-implementation> is just a pixel surface. The loading machinery lives in HTMLImageElement, where it should be. In a way, the <real-image-implementation> could be just a canvas tag. It has no loading/error plumbing whatsoever. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 23:17:36 UTC