- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:21:58 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18611 --- Comment #2 from Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> 2012-08-18 00:21:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Second, I don't think it has been proven that this pattern is common enough > that adding syntax sugar for it is warranted at this time. It's not syntax sugar, it's an API simplification: as far as scripts are concerned, neuterable, closable, transferable objects are are all the same thing, yet the APIs are needlessly diverging, giving an inconsistent, piecemeal API. (Similarly, ArrayBuffer is missing .close.) > Please don't file new bugs on this. If you want to keep discussing this, either > keep commenting in existing bugs (you can even reopen them), or start a thread > on the list. I filed a new bug because reopening the one I saw (#17757) didn't make sense (since it was just about a note). -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2012 00:21:59 UTC