- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:39:11 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15818 --- Comment #6 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> 2012-08-01 16:39:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'd prefer to keep the read-write nature of the CSS OM here if we can. That way > a component author can apply tweaks to the core stylesheet dynamically which > affect all shadow DOM subtrees referencing that stylesheet. > > Also rather than passing an URL, what about passing a reference to an actual > <link> or <style> element? This aligns more closely with the proposal for > custom elements while providing a bit more flexibility for dynamic generation > (e.g. if a framework wanted to inline all CSS as part of their JS file, then > build out a <style> element at runtime). Yes, I am leaning toward this as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 16:39:13 UTC