Re: XHR LC comment: Accept header went from MUST NOT to SHOULD

On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:47:23 +0200, Stewart Brodie  
<stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote:
> I don't think it is being specified.  My original suggestion was to add
> something saying that if the client chose to add the header then it  
> SHOULD
> use "*/*" as the value.  Anne already rejected this on the grounds that
> existing desktop browsers send arbitrary values for the header.  I don't
> like that situation (I think those browsers are simply broken), but given
> that the desktop browsers aren't going to change to comply, accepted  
> that it could be left unspecified.

I changed this later on and made it do what you requested, by the way.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Monday, 26 May 2008 12:56:45 UTC