- From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 11:34:20 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: "public-webapi@w3.org" <public-webapi@w3.org>, IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team <ieajax@microsoft.com>
Ahh, I see my mail client can do that. I just need to make a few changes. Having a standardized guidance here would be very helpful -:p. -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:34 AM To: Sunava Dutta Cc: public-webapi@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team Subject: Re: XHR LC comments Sunava, it would be helpful if you'd use a mail client that can properly quote :-) In your mail your text appears as if it was indirectly quoted by myself... I have reformatted your reply so it becomes clear again who said what. Sunava Dutta wrote: >> Julian Reschke wrote: >> c) >> "- TRACK??? There's probably a rational for that. If there is, please >> include it in the spec." > >TRACK is unsafe and should be removed. I remember reading about this awhile back. Here's something I found on the web: http://www.aqtronix.com/Advisories/AQ-2003-02.txt That implies that Microsoft closed the vulnerability with IIS 6.0, so I'm not entirely sure why a spec in last call in 2008 needs to speak about it. There are surely other old servers that have other vulnerabilities that could be exploited using XHR, should we consider all of these? That being said, I'm ok with *mentioning* the issue somewhere, but just enumerating TRACK along with TRACE, as if this was a standard HTTP method, is *highly* confusing. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 18:35:09 UTC