- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:40:17 +0100
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
* Jonas Sicking wrote: >I agree with Daniel here. I'm not really following your argument. Are we >trying to keep compatibility with the SVG spec here? Is the interface as >designed now 100% compatible with SVG? The element count attribute is new, other than that I am not aware of differences. >If we're not 100% compatible with SVG, why would they oppose an >improvement like the suggested one? Content that uses childElements[...] would not function correctly in SVG Tiny 1.2 implementations for no particularily good reason. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 16:41:13 UTC