- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:16:01 -0700
- To: Travis Leithead <travil@windows.microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>, "public-appformats@w3.org" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Mar 26, 2008, at 14:36, Travis Leithead <travil@windows.microsoft.com> wrote: >> I strongly object to the Web API working group adopting a proprietary >> solution developed by one vendor with no external consultation, >> when the >> group has already spent several man-years' worth of time on a >> technologically superior, safer, and more comprehensive solution >> that has >> as much implementation experience and significantly more authoring >> experience, based on extending existing APIs instead of arbitarily >> introducing new, incompatible APIs. > > I don't see how introducing a new object is 'incompatible'. It seems > to have the same degree of 'compatibility' as introducing new APIs > on the XHR object. The XHR2 proposal isn't a new API. It's the same API for same-domain as cross-domain requests. -- Ian Hickson
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 22:16:46 UTC