public-webapi@w3.org from March 2008 by date

Monday, 31 March 2008

• Re: several messages about binding stuff Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 29 March 2008

• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 28 March 2008

• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Olli Pettay
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Doug Schepers
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [Element Traversal LC] access to element by index Daniel Glazman
• XDR and bike sheds Re: What is Microsoft's intent... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: several messages about binding stuff Ian Hickson
• Re: [Bindings] Allow ExtendedAttributeList to be Omitted Cameron McCormack
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Sunava Dutta

Thursday, 27 March 2008

• RE: DOM3 Events Keyflow Travis Leithead
• Re: DOM3 Events Keyflow Alexey Proskuryakov
• DOM3 Events Keyflow Doug Schepers
• [Bindings] Allow ExtendedAttributeList to be Omitted Lachlan Hunt
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Stewart Brodie
• Charter arcana Re: Updates to Bindings spec, republish? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Updates to Bindings spec, republish? Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Question regarding XDR and https Sunava Dutta
• Question regarding XDR and https Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 26 March 2008

• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Ian Hickson
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Eric Lawrence
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Jonas Sicking
• Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Ian Hickson
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Travis Leithead
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Sunava Dutta
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Ian Hickson
• RE: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Sunava Dutta
• Minutes, DOM3 Events Telcon, 26 March 2008 Doug Schepers
• Re: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Olli Pettay
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 26 March 2008 (Tomorrow!!) Doug Schepers
• Updates to Bindings spec, republish? Cameron McCormack

Monday, 24 March 2008

• What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à-vis W3C? [Was: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests] Arthur Barstow

Sunday, 23 March 2008

• RE: [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects Travis Leithead

Friday, 21 March 2008

• RE: XHR tests Sunava Dutta
• Re: XHR tests Hallvord R. M. Steen

Thursday, 20 March 2008

• Keyboard Review Telcon Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

• Minutes: DOM3 Events Telcon, 19 March 2008 Doug Schepers
• Test Work Carmelo Montanez
• Re: [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects Garrett Smith
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? liorean
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver question: non-String returns Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects liorean
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Ian Hickson
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Cameron McCormack
• RE: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Travis Leithead
• Re: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 18 March 2008

• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Ian Hickson
• Re: [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects Cameron McCormack
• Re: Resp.: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Cameron McCormack
• Re: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Cameron McCormack
• RE: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Travis Leithead
• Re: Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Olli Pettay
• Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Minutes, 27 Feb 2008 Travis Leithead
• Re: Safari 3.1 adding showModalDialog?? Maciej Stachowiak
• Please Review: Mousewheel Event Proposal Doug Schepers
• Re: Safari 3.1 adding showModalDialog?? Boris Zbarsky
• Safari 3.1 adding showModalDialog?? Travis Leithead
• Resp.: [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? João Eiras
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 19 March 2008 (Tomorrow!!) Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Jonas Sicking
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects Anne van Kesteren
• [Bindings] 'new' behavior on interface objects Travis Leithead
• [Bindings] What does typeof return for interface objects? Travis Leithead
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Laurens Holst
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Laurens Holst
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Henri Sivonen
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Thomas Roessler
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests John Panzer
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta

Monday, 17 March 2008

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Julian Reschke
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Thomas Roessler
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta
• Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVGt1.2: Text Box David Woolley
• Re: [svg-developers] Re: SVGt1.2: Text Box ~:'' ありがとうございました。
• Re: SVGt1.2: Text Box Erik Dahlström
• Re: SVGt1.2: Text Box Andreas Neumann
• SVGt1.2: Text Box ~:'' ありがとうございました。
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Collin Jackson

Sunday, 16 March 2008

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Julian Reschke
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sean Hogan
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Kris Zyp

Saturday, 15 March 2008

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Laurens Holst
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Laurens Holst
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Henri Sivonen
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 14 March 2008

• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Eric Lawrence

Saturday, 15 March 2008

• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Kris Zyp
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Ian Hickson
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Lachlan Hunt
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta

Friday, 14 March 2008

• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Jonas Sicking
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Chris Wilson
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak
• [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments Sergiu Dumitriu
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Chris Wilson
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Chris Wilson
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• RE: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Travis Leithead
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Doug Schepers
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Laurens Holst
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Boris Zbarsky
• RE: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta
• Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Jonas Sicking
• IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests Sunava Dutta
• Re: [Element Traversal LC] Editorial: "attribute" at ECMAScript Language Binding Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Robert Sayre
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Ian Hickson
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Doug Schepers
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Ian Hickson
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 13 March 2008

• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Alex Russell
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Jeff Schiller
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Jonas Sicking
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Jeff Schiller
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Jeff Schiller
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG Jeff Schiller
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? liorean
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Alex Russell
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? liorean
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? liorean
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Lachlan Hunt
• RE: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Kartikaya Gupta
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? liorean
• Minutes: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 12 March 2008 Doug Schepers
• [selectors-api] Why no querySelector(All) on DocumentFragments? Boris Zbarsky
• [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver question: non-String returns Boris Zbarsky
• [Element Traversal LC] XML Core (no comment) review Grosso, Paul
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? liorean
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Simon Pieters
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Boris Zbarsky
• Today's Telecon Carmelo Montanez
• [Element Traversal LC] Editorial: "attribute" at ECMAScript Language Binding KUROSAWA, Takeshi
• Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? Doug Schepers
• Re: [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? Slim Amamou
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 12 March 2008 (Today!!) Doug Schepers
• Re: [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? Doug Schepers
• Re: [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? Doug Schepers
• [selectors-api] NSResolver question: non-String returns Boris Zbarsky
• [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces? Boris Zbarsky

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Kris Zyp
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Kris Zyp
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Kris Zyp
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 10 March 2008

• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Jonas Sicking
• Re: [xmlhttprequest] getResponseHeader() for invalid header Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Kris Zyp
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Kris Zyp

Sunday, 9 March 2008

• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Morgan L

Friday, 7 March 2008

• Re: [xmlhttprequest] getResponseHeader() for invalid header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR2] Editorial: Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [xmlhttprequest] getResponseHeader() for invalid header Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Jonas Sicking
• Re: [xmlhttprequest] getResponseHeader() for invalid header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [xmlhttprequest] getResponseHeader() for invalid header Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Morgan L
• Re: Geolocation API proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• [xmlhttprequest] getResponseHeader() for invalid header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Geolocation API proposal Scott Shattuck
• Re: [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? Simon Pieters
• Re: [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? liorean
• More on DOM 3 Test Suite Effort Carmelo Montanez
• Re: Geolocation API proposal Doug Schepers
• Re: XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers laurent
• Re: XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers Sergey Ilinsky
• Re: XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers João Eiras
• Re: XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers laurent
• [Elemement Traversal LC] why is the interface implemented as attributes in ECMASCRIPT? Slim Amamou
• Re: Geolocation API proposal Robert Sayre
• Re: XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XHR setRequestHeader("connection", "close") is bogusly rejected Morgan L
• Geolocation API proposal Aaron Boodman

Thursday, 6 March 2008

• Re: Extra Connection Support Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• Time for Next Week Carmelo Montanez
• Re: Extra Connection Support Proposal Kris Zyp
• Re: Extra Connection Support Proposal Mark Baker
• Key Event Order Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 5 March 2008

• Minutes, March 5th - DOM 3 Events telcon Andrew Emmons

Thursday, 6 March 2008

• Regrets Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 05 March 2008 (Today!!) Charles McCathieNevile
• MouseWheel Proposal Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 5 March 2008

• XBL 2.0 implementation made available for major browsers Sergey Ilinsky
• DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 05 March 2008 (Today!!) Doug Schepers

Monday, 3 March 2008

• Re: Pipelining Control Proposal Kris Zyp

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2008 03:56:44 UTC