- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:03:41 +0100
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:57:08 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > The main problem IMO is that OPTIONS isn't cacheable, which is going to > pretty severely limit things. That's why we have an authorization request cache. Which you also need with the GET solution as a sbusequent POST would have invalidated the cache. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 12 January 2008 13:00:41 UTC