- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:42:18 +0200
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-webapi@w3.org
On Mon, 21 May 2007 03:33:39 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Implementors that use the IDL to generate code for the implementations: > which would you prefer? Do implementors use the IDL directly or do they modify it before using it? In the latter case making the specification easier to write and read makes sense to me... Implementors that have ECMAScript support can also benefit as they can probably auto-generate more code if ECMAScript properties becomes part of the new IDL syntax. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 10:42:46 UTC