- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:10:55 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote: >> I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does not >> support XML at all !! > > I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may > still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there > should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if > the baseline conforming implementation doesn't. That makes sense. I added a "conforming XML user agent" class. I hope this satisfies the people who replied in this thread (all in To:). (I'm treating the comment from Stewart Brodie as a separate comment.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:11:33 UTC