Re: Recent spec change to XMLHttpRequest default Content-Type

* Carsten Orthbandt wrote:
>Given the importance of XMLHttpRequest for dynamic web applications I think
>it's very very bad to log errors where there are none. But I was pointed at
>the upcoming spec change and told that this should be the standard behaviour.
>As stated above, XMLHttpRequest is NOT only for XML. We use it for very light-
>weight data formats and try to achieve minimal header overhead. For our typical
>XMLHttpRequest the header size is already 30-90% of the total message length
>so an additional header DOES matter.

Why don't you use less &, <, and ]]> sequences in the content and wrap
it into <x>...</x>?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 07:34:03 UTC