- From: Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 16:01:23 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Stewart Brodie" <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Tue, 08 May 2007 13:58:30 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 08 May 2007 13:20:21 +0200, Stewart Brodie > <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: >> The send() event seems to have changed considerably since the previous >> drafts that I saw. I think that you need more explanation for the >> bizarre readystatechange event during step 5 of the send() algorithm >> since, as the note points out, the state hasn't changed. > > This is matches what implementations do. I'm quite late to the party but as a general comment I think there is such a thing as a quirk that no real life sites rely on, or are extremely unlikely to rely on, in which case it would not need to become standardised. For a corner case like this my gut feeling would be to only add it to the spec if content was found that depended on this behaviour. -- Hallvord R. M. Steen Core QA JavaScript tester, Opera Software http://www.opera.com/ Opera - simply the best Internet experience
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2007 13:59:59 UTC