- From: Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:24:50 -0000
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Na , Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> escreveu: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:52:00 -0500, Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> And a suggestion: in the spec I read "@@Issue: Does it bubble / is it >> cancelable? I am not sure why it would / be, myself." >> It should only bubble and have as target the related document, or xhr >> object, just like the load event. > > Actually, that was the bit I forgot to say before. In fact, we decided > to make > it cancelable, but not bubble, since you could capture it if you want and > forcing it to bubble eats run-time resources... > > If you think we got it badly wrong, can you please give a more detailed > explanation of why? The only rationale we were offered so far was that > since > more or less everything bubbles, it would require special casing this in > an > implementation to stop it bubbling which is a minor pain. Our call was > that the > run-time cost was more serious. > > cheers > > Chaals > Sorry, I meant only to have a capturing phase, and not to bubble.
Received on Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:24:59 UTC