- From: David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:04:52 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapi@w3.org
On 2007-01-25 20:53, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:48:35 -0500, David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> What I mean is, why does grabbing the first node deserve its own
>> method? Is that really a common thing to do, grabbing the first node?
>> More common than grabbing the second or last node for instance?
>
> Do you have a concrete example? Say that in the following document we
> want to get one of the <p> elements:
>
> <html>
> <p/>
> <p/>
> <p/>
> </html>
>
> We'd do this as follows:
>
> 1. document.getElementBySelector("html > p")
> 2. document.getElementBySelector("html > p:not(:first-child)")
> 3. document.getElementBySelector("html > p:last-child")
>
> (Or using an equivalent group of selectors.)
Yes, but grabbing the first node has its own method. Grabbing the second
or last does not. What I don't understand is _why_ there is a special
method for grabbing the first node? I just don't think that is a common
thing to do, and as Jim said, those nodes usually have an id.
--
David Håsäther
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 20:05:05 UTC