- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:38:41 -0800
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF2AFC8F5C.E21528A1-ON8825726E.0065AFF6-8825726E.00666B2E@us.ibm.com>
Hi Anne,
These names are fine with me.
Jon
ps - I can certainly sympathize with you having to make an editorial change
with which you disagree. I had to do this hundreds of time during my
editorial stints in W3C committees. The worst one of all was when the SVG
working decided against my very strong arguments that the coordinate system
for SVG should have the y axis pointing down, which result in rotations
going the wrong direction versus what we all learn in school. I still have
nightmares about that one. But getting a standard out the door (with a few
warts) is better than endless argument.
"Anne van
Kesteren"
<annevk@opera.com To
> "Web API WG (public)"
Sent by: <public-webapi@w3.org>
public-webapi-req cc
uest@w3.org
Subject
Selectors API naming
01/25/2007 10:26
AM
So the WG just discussed in a little over an hour a counter proposal to
the current naming[1] and came up with:
* getElementBySelectors()
* getElementListBySelectors()
I don't really like them. Supposedly I'm to edit the draft to reflect
this...
[1]<
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/Overview.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&r=1.19
>
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic08750.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 18:38:58 UTC