- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:34:48 +0100
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Alexey Proskuryakov" <ap-carbon@rambler.ru>, public-webapi@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:57:10 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Well, does any of the existing implementations support parsing HTML and > returning an XML DOM? And why would you want to do that in the first > place? FWIW, there's no such thing as an "XML DOM" as far as browsers are concerned. (Although IEs implementation may differ at this point.) There's a single DOM and HTML and XML are just different serialization formats. Given that responseXML returns a DOM... > If we start adding new things to the spec, then please let's try not to > add hacks, but to define good new APIs. Setting the headers comes to > mind, or the ability to retrieve binary content... Those are being considered. I personally wouldn't consider it a hack. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 18:36:14 UTC