- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:33:39 +0100
- To: "Alexey Proskuryakov" <ap-carbon@rambler.ru>, public-webapi@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:43:25 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov <ap-carbon@rambler.ru> wrote: > Another consideration: architecturally, it may be unwise to combine both > loading and parsing functionality in a single API. Agreed, but that's how it is. > For XML parsing, DOM3 Load (or another dedicated API) could provide much > more control. Obviously, we cannot remove responseXML from > XMLHttpRequest, but not adding more known formats sounds like a good > idea to me. Is such control really needed? For most people having responseXML seems fine. Given how widely used HTML is it makes sense to make responseXML also work for text/html resources given that browsers treat text/html as prescribed by HTML5. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 16:47:02 UTC