- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:20:00 +0100
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:17:04 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> (I'm interested both in having existing behavior documented, but also >>> to have precise APIs for future implementations) >> Right, me too. The problem is that you can't do both at the same time. > > Sort of. That we can't change legacy implementations is true, but we > *can* describe how things should be done in future implementations. (Is > there a timeline for a revision that takes us there???) We are describing how things should be done in future implementations and revisions of current implementations while remaining as backwards compatible as possible. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 11:20:11 UTC