- From: David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:38:28 +0100
- To: Christophe Jolif <cjolif@ilog.fr>
- CC: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On 2007-02-06 14:07, Christophe Jolif wrote: > Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Not having heard strong objections, and having had support for >> getElementsBySelector() that is at least as strong as anything else, I >> think (with my chair's hat) this can be taken as the current >> resolution of the naming debate. >> >> Which would also resolve ISSUE-110. >> >> Any objections? > > +1 Why? Because dojo has a method with a different name (not very similar in my opinion) that does something completely different? -- David Håsäther
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 13:38:46 UTC