public-webapi@w3.org from February 2007 by date

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Julian Reschke
• Last Call - XMLHttpRequest Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [xhr] editorial: typo Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: sending documents Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: sending documents Alexey Proskuryakov

Monday, 26 February 2007

• Re: XHR: sending documents Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call William J. Edney
• [xhr] editorial: typo Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

• Re: [XHR] ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests mikewse
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call William J. Edney
• Re: File Upload Re: FWD HTML DOM Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 26 February 2007

• RE: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke
• Re: File Upload Re: FWD HTML DOM Arun Ranganathan
• RE: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Sunava Dutta
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Alexey Proskuryakov
• REX, updates, patents and prior art Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 24 February 2007

• Re: XHR: responseText encoding detection Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 23 February 2007

• Re: ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• XHR(2): suggestions for enhancing synchronous mode Mike Wilson
• Re: ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests Mike Wilson

Friday, 23 February 2007

• Re: [XHR] send() argument Hallvord R. M. Steen

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• Re: [XHR] odd sentence about getResponseHeader Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] send() argument Simon Pieters
• Re: [XHR] odd sentence about getResponseHeader Shadow2531
• Re: [XHR] odd sentence about getResponseHeader Anne van Kesteren
• XHR: responseText encoding detection Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XHR: sending documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XHR] send() argument Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [XHR] odd sentence about getResponseHeader Hallvord R. M. Steen
• [XHR] send() argument Hallvord R. M. Steen

Sunday, 18 February 2007

• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• RE: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Sunava Dutta

Sunday, 18 February 2007

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• XHR and compat (was: Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Robert Sayre
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Robert Sayre
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Anne van Kesteren
• [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft Julian Reschke

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• File upload Re: Fwd: HTML DOM Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: HTML DOM Robin Berjon
• Fwd: Questionnaire on Javascript RDF API-s Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• Fwd: HTML DOM Erez Segal
• Re: ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Ellen Siegel
• Re: XMLHttpRequest is an EventTarget ? Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: XMLHttpRequest is an EventTarget ? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest is an EventTarget ? João Eiras
• Re: XMLHttpRequest is an EventTarget ? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest is an EventTarget ? Anne van Kesteren
• XMLHttpRequest is an EventTarget ? João Eiras
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Doug Schepers
• XMLHttpRequest for Last Call Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Erik Arvidsson

Sunday, 11 February 2007

• Re: ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• Re: ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Ian Hickson
• ISSUE-112: Should progress run a UI or rely on other stuff too? Web APIs Issue Tracker

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• Re: Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Martijn
• Fwd: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Maciej Stachowiak
• Face to face minutes... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Christophe Jolif
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() David Håsäther
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() David Håsäther
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Christophe Jolif
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() David Håsäther
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Christophe Jolif
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-109: Do loaded/total count the bytes transferred with encodings applied or not? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 5 February 2007

• Re: Progress event spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Progress event spec Jean-Claude Dufourd
• Re: ISSUE-109: Do loaded/total count the bytes transferred with encodings applied or not? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Progress event spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Progress event spec Jean-Claude Dufourd

Friday, 2 February 2007

• Re: Progress event spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Progress event spec Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Progress event spec Jean-Claude Dufourd
• Re: Progress event spec Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Progress event spec Jean-Claude Dufourd

Thursday, 1 February 2007

• Re: Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) Maciej Stachowiak

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 18:36:14 UTC