- From: Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:23:47 +0100
- To: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 15:23:57 UTC
2007/8/21, liorean <liorean@gmail.com>: > > > On 21/08/07, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > > We'd rather have the members of HTMLDocument that are useful for all > types > > of documents to be moved to the Document interface. This would probably > be: > > > > * location > > * URL (also present in SVGDocument) > > * domain (also present in SVGDocument) > > * referrer (also present in SVGDocument) > > * cookie > > * lastModified > > * getElementsByClassName > > * innerHTML > > * activeElement > > * hasFocus > > * getSelection > > How about document.title? > > > Furthermore, it might make sense to move the following members from > > HTMLElement to the Element interface: > > > > * getElementsByClassName > > Does this make sense on Element? I mean, the class attribute and it's > semantics are HTML/XHTML specific. The same goes for innerHTML. I agree there could be a generic property to access the markup directly, but innerHTML's name is out of context. -- > David "liorean" Andersson > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 15:23:57 UTC