- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:47:40 +0200
- To: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Hi, I've heard some use cases from authors who want to handle more response codes. For 30x responses and 401 responses. 304 is already addressed by XHR1 by letting the author set various headers himself that will let the user agent pass through the actual response if it's a 304. However, redirects are always transparantly and a 401 will trigger a dialog where the user will have to enter credentials. Letting the author handle redirects helps him save bandwidth or lets him inspect the redirect URI to see whether or not to follow it. Letting him handle 401 responses would help in the case where the user entered credentials in the first place and then a request was made using those credentials and they were entered incorrectly. In such cases handling it within your application might give a better user experience than letting the browser handle it. For redirects a 'redirect' event is proposed in the draft, but maybe a general attribute that would indicate that the author wants to handle responses himself would be better. Although it seems that only 401 and redirects are affected by this so maybe a redirect and unauthorized event would work... Any opinions? Cheers, -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 13:47:39 UTC