RE: [XHR2] Remarks in version Editor's draft 2 August 2007

>>Why is this CR LF ? isn't LF sufficient ?
CRLF is mandatory on HTTP level. We avoid conversion and keep the solution coherent with lower layer.

.Marcin

-----Original Message-----
From: public-webapi-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapi-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Innovimax SARL
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:24 PM
To: public-webapi@w3.org
Subject: [XHR2] Remarks in version Editor's draft 2 August 2007


[[
* Return all the HTTP headers, as a single string, with each header
line separated by a U+000D CR U+000A LF pair excluding the status
line.
]]
Why is this CR LF ? isn't LF sufficient ?

==
In "7. If charset is "null" let charset be UTF-8."

UTF-8 should appear in orange

== Reference ==
Nothing to say =)

==Typo ==
s/Unauthorised/Unauthorized/
s/anologously/analogously/
s/behaviour/behavior/
s/reponse/response/

Mohamed
-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr

RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 07:56:23 UTC