- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:28:26 +0200
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Web API public" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:36:30 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > Ian suggested that there should be a required frequency for progress > events, and there was an issue over whether anything has to fire. The > current draft requires that a loadstart fire, and some kind of event > that signals an end-condition fire, but there is no requirement that a > progress event fire in the middle, nor proposed frequency for this. > > I propose to leave the specification without further suggestions about > frequency, and ths close these two issues > http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/106 > http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/107 I would suggest that you explicitly mention that when the events are dispatched is up to the specifications using the progress events, such as the hypothetical XMLHttpRequest 2, the WHATWG HTML <video> element proposal, etc. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 06:28:24 UTC