- From: Jean-Yves Bitterlich <Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:12:18 +0200
- To: public-webapi@w3.org
- Message-id: <461C9862.9080909@sun.com>
Stewart: Here an example of an application defining an event, where canDispatch returns 'false' (at least in our interpretation of the current specification) [it's java :-)] ----------------------------------------- DocumentBuilderFactory docBF = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); Document document = docBF.newDocumentBuilder().newDocument(); if (document.getImplementation().hasFeature("Events", "2.0")) { DocumentEvent docEvent = (DocumentEvent)document.getFeature("+Events", "2.0"); EventListener el = new EventListener(){public void handleEvent(Event evt){}}; CustomEvent event = (CustomEvent)docEvent.createEvent("CustomEvent"); event.initCustomEventNS(null, "myType", true, true, "myCustomEvent"); ((EventTarget)document).addEventListenerNS(event.getNamespaceURI(), event.getType(), el, false, null); ((EventTarget)document).dispatchEvent(event); if(!docEvent.canDispatch(event.getNamespaceURI(), event.getType())) { /* here: canDispatch()=false ... do we really want this being false?!?! */ System.out.println("DocumentEvent.canDispatch(...) returns false."); } } ----------------------------------------- the point/confusion being here that this method returns false for all events with namespaceURI that doesn't equal null. It happens for CustomEvents with namespaceURI that equals null also. But all such events should be generated and dispatched correctly. Again (our feeling) is that the specification sounds like the implementation cannot/should-not dispatch application specific events. -- Jean-Yves Bitterlich, Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, 85551 Heimstetten, Germany Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028 Geschäftsführer: Marcel Schneider, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Bömer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 20803943 HypoVereinsbank München, Konto 31 625 009, BLZ 700 202 70
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 08:12:23 UTC