- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:46:01 +0200
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:35:24 +0200, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote: >> The shortest name should represent the most efficient method imho. > > Crazy notion, names should be clear, not short for efficiency. The point was that if the more efficient one of the two actually had a longer name, people would probably use the shorter name and just take the first node using [0] or whatever can be used for that in their language binding. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 07:46:14 UTC