Re: Extension HTTP methods

On May 14, 2006, at 14:30, Jim Ley wrote:
> Sure, but if the groups aim is to work in public, then it needs to  
> work in public, ie provide the motivations for the decisions, and  
> not just the decisions, otherwise exactly what happens here happens  
> and all we get is discussion on the public list that exactly  
> reflects the existing discussions already had at a f2f or in a  
> telcon etc. Which wastes everyones time.  Just reporting decisions  
> is unhelpful, especially when they reverse previous public  
> decisions of the group.

Which is why we have public minutes too. It just so happens that  
cleaning up the minutes takes time, so that the f2f ones haven't been  
distributed yet.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 21:29:45 UTC