- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:06:11 +0200
- To: "Daniel Schierbeck" <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:41:41 +0200, Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com> wrote: > The current example[1] of an XMLHttpRequest constructor, > var r = new XMLHttpRequest(); > is fine and all, but the variable name `r' strikes me as a bit odd. > I know it's not the job of the W3C to teach best programming practices, > but at least using somewhat descriptive variable names in examples would > not be out of order. This is better: > var request = new XMLHttpRequest(); > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20060405/#xmlhttprequest Given that it doesn't have to be a request I think 'r' is saver or perhaps just 'x'... Cheers, Anne -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 11:06:41 UTC