- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:43:04 +1100
- To: public-webapi@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak: > Yes, that's it exactly. Do you think anything needs to be added to > any spec to make this more clear? Some words in DOM 2 Style to that effect may be useful. The sentence The expectation is that an instance of the ViewCSS interface can be obtained by using binding-specific casting methods on an instance of the AbstractView interface. to me sounded like that you need to downcast from an AbstractView to a ViewCSS, which is a whole view in itself, rather than "crosscasting" to an interface that this view also happens to implement. I inferred this from the fact that ViewCSS inherits from AbstractView, and the sentence This interface represents a CSS view. which certainly makes it sound like it is a view unto itself, and not just an interface for getting some extra information from an existing view. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ICQ: 26955922 cam (at) mcc.id.au MSN: cam (at) mcc.id.au http://mcc.id.au/ JBR: heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 10:43:24 UTC