Re: Updated Window draft

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:14:18 +0100, Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com> wrote:
> This is looking good. Can you change the naming to be consistent with  
> the version I added? I used ED prefix to denote an editors draft  
> followed by the short name and date. I think this one should be called  
> ED-window-20060320
> That way we can keep a linked history of developments and point to diffs  
> without having to use cvsweb

Using this for publication seems ok, but doing it for the source (.xml)  
version of the draft is not a very good idea imho. Being able to see  
through the changes list in CVS what has changed for each revision of the  
source document is much easier than having to diff each subsequent source  
version.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 14:07:22 UTC