- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:00:00 -0000
- To: "Web APIs WG \(public\)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:20:09 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> > wrote: >>> It's beginning to look like me that it has no uses and should be >>> dropped. >> >> I don't have strong feelings either way. Does anyone want to advocate >> for putting DOMContentLoaded in the spec? > > The use case is to able to modify the DOM with (external) scripts once it > is ready while not all images, plugins etc. are loaded[1]. > [1]<http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2005/09/busted/> Anne, that's more a definition of what it is, than a use case. The referenced URL is also talking about the original use case suggested (that of adding behaviour to DOM nodes) and I thought we agreed it failed to meet that use case due to incremental rendering? Cheers, Jim.
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 12:01:08 UTC