- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:45:53 +0900
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
Le 27 juil. 06 à 10:17, Ian Hickson a écrit :
>> Note that we were more than happy to see a security section.
>
> Personally I think that having a separate security section is a bad
> way of
> designing a spec, since it doesn't encourage you to think of
> security the
> whole time -- it's better, IMHO, to have security right at the core
> of the
> specification text. But again, I'll leave that up to the editor.
Maybe, yes.
What you suggest, recommend practically?
for this specification.
and for future specifications.
Do you have tips or hints to help editors?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 02:46:06 UTC