- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:15:16 +0100
- To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 09:16:13 UTC
On Sunday 2006-02-26 15:07 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> These don't necessarily have to be the tightest possible bounds. For
> example, requiring Node.nextSibling to be O(1) might limit
> implementations too much and an upper bound of O(log N) might be
> sufficient. Sometimes there are also information-theoretic limits to
Mozilla's implementation of Node.nextSibling is O(N) in the number of
(prior) siblings of the element.
-David
--
L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 09:16:13 UTC