- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:15:16 +0100
- To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 09:16:13 UTC
On Sunday 2006-02-26 15:07 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > These don't necessarily have to be the tightest possible bounds. For > example, requiring Node.nextSibling to be O(1) might limit > implementations too much and an upper bound of O(log N) might be > sufficient. Sometimes there are also information-theoretic limits to Mozilla's implementation of Node.nextSibling is O(N) in the number of (prior) siblings of the element. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 09:16:13 UTC