Re: XMPP API

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robin Berjon wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 23:40, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> If and when the Web API WG decides to work on an XMPP API, I stand ready
>> to help.
> 
> Sorry for the time it took to send you an answer, as you know we have a
> bunch of deliverables and we're focusing on that.
> 
> It's hard for us take on new work per se, but the WG is definitely very
> interested in an XMPP API. If you wish to start drafting one, we'll
> definitely do our best to help you. The only condition is that it cannot
> get in the way of our priority deliverables. Do have specific ideas in
> mind as to what the API would look like?

I understand about priority deliverables -- I have a bunch of those
myself. I probably won't get a chance to think more about an XMPP API
for a few weeks at least, perhaps not even until you folks release some
of your candidate recommendations (which would probably give me a good
idea of the framework in which you're working). So I may simply wait,
but that doesn't mean I'm not interested in tackling the problem.

Thanks for following up.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD/LeoNF1RSzyt3NURAumBAJ9RusGJ9w0kSj6BGeNa4spUCyl9zwCfU5FU
cxT+pXaiaggMIC8V0JEVwJM=
=WooJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 19:12:43 UTC