- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:23:44 +0100
- To: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:45:20 +0100, Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/24/06, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:26:51 +0100, Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > - It's too generic. Instead of matchAll, it could have been named >> > getAll, collectAll, etc. >> >> I would be fine with get() and getAll() on document (and element). I >> agree >> that they would make more sense. > > Well, my point was actually that they don't make sense, since it could > mean anything. > So, I would not be happy with using those names. Yeah, my suspicion is that that would be a step in the much-too-generic-to-be-clear direction that leads, down the track, to the thing that is even better being called something even less clear. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Monday, 25 December 2006 20:23:57 UTC