- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:32:42 +0100
- To: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 16:26:51 +0100, Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com> wrote: > - It's too generic. Instead of matchAll, it could have been named > getAll, collectAll, etc. I would be fine with get() and getAll() on document (and element). I agree that they would make more sense. > - It is inconsistent with current naming. Isn't there a need/desire > for the w3c to be consistent with the naming of new methods regarding > older specs? Not if the old methods effectively become obsolete. True enough, they return a live NodeList and so might be useful for some use cases but I don't think that goes for the majority if you see the usage of such methods on the web. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 24 December 2006 15:32:59 UTC