Re: Selectors API naming

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:46:08 +0100, Doug Schepers <doug@schepers.cc> wrote:
>> One of the arguments that was made was also that the existing methods
>> have failed, which would make #3 the odd one out and probably #2 as
>> well. "I don't really care what the final name, but it should match
>> the first principle..."
>
> Given the editor's strong stance for your own viewpoint, it seems that  
> your deference to him is not altruistic.

I was merely negating your argument, hence the quotation marks.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 22:50:04 UTC